Home » Miscellany, News, Statistics

2010 Elite Selection Playoff: Week Eleven

By · November 15th, 2010 · 0 Comments · 2,740 views
1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars
2010 Elite Selection Playoff: Week Eleven

There are still four unbeaten teams. Auburn bested Georgia in a slugfest, Boise State handled Idaho, Oregon survived against California, and TCU edged out San Diego State. With the exception of the Broncos, the other four teams looked largely human.

The trend of top ranked AVR teams with weak schedules continues. Of the top 10 AVR teams, six—Boise State, Oregon, TCU, Nebraska, Ohio State, and Wisconsin—have strength of schedules ranked in the bottom half of the country while the highest strength of schedule among these 10 teams belongs to LSU at number 31.

With the win over Utah, Notre Dame moves from 65th last week to 52nd. The Irish have played the 2nd most difficult strength of schedule (SOS), rank 21st in quality wins/losses (QWL), 65th in adjusted win percentage (AWP), 59th in margin of victory (MOV), and 49th in team performance ratio (TPR)—66th in offense and 21st on defense. Should the defense hold on to that TPR ranking, it would be an improvement of 37 spots from last season, an improvement no team accomplished from 2008 to 2009.

Future Irish opponent AVR ranks: Army—50th, and USC—24th.

Elite Selection Playoff (ESP)
RankTeamAP PollCoaches PollAV RankingPoints
1Auburn2211
1Oregon1131
3Boise St3320.958
4TCU4440.904
5LSU5650.849
6Wisconsin65100.78
7Ohio State8780.753
8Nebraska9970.726
9Stanford78110.712
10Oklahoma St121060.684
11Michigan St111190.643
12Alabama1012120.602
13Arkansas1313140.52
14Missouri1516130.465
15Oklahoma1614160.438
16Virginia Tech1415180.424
17Nevada1918150.356
18South Carolina1717200.328
19Iowa2120170.273
19Texas A&M1819210.273
21Miami FL2421230.136
22Mississippi St2222250.123
23Southern Cal20NR240.109
24Utah2524220.095
24Hawai`iNRNR190.095
AV Ranking (AVR)
RankTeamPointsStrength of ScheduleQuality Wins/LossesAdjusted Win PercentageMargin of VictoryTeam Performance Ratio
1Auburn1431486
2Boise St0.9719610131
3Oregon0.9491039214
4TCU0.9458623323
5LSU0.87931791919
6Oklahoma St0.87537315129
7Nebraska0.8787251120
8Ohio State0.86773401142
9Michigan St0.8615712112412
10Wisconsin0.858973958
11Stanford0.83285675714
12Alabama0.822781497
13Missouri0.803915201810
14Arkansas0.7914816141315
15Nevada0.781113585631
16Oklahoma0.763848191627
17Iowa0.7611533155
18Virginia Tech0.7597832141411
19Hawai`i0.7312911262713
20South Carolina0.722266333616
21Texas A&M0.7132013332024
22Utah0.69310467131055
23Miami FL0.695067223218
24Southern Cal0.6884519224339
25Mississippi St0.6824724334022
Adjusted Win Percentage (AWP)
RankTeamPoints
1Boise St1
2Oregon0.994
3TCU0.981
4Auburn0.972
5Nebraska0.885
5Oklahoma St0.885
5Nevada0.885
5Stanford0.885
9Wisconsin0.875
9LSU0.875
Strength of Schedule (SOS)
RankTeamPoints
1Washington1
2Notre Dame0.9
3Minnesota0.805
4Florida0.76
5Washington St0.756
6Cincinnati0.745
7Wake Forest0.727
8UCLA0.721
9Missouri0.707
10Vanderbilt0.707
Team Performance Ratio (TPR)
RankTeamPoints
1Boise St1
2Ohio State0.979
3TCU0.964
4Oregon0.929
5Iowa0.915
6Auburn0.85
7Alabama0.822
8Wisconsin0.804
9Oklahoma St0.801
10Missouri0.8
Margin of Victory (MOV)
RankTeamPoints
1Oregon1
2TCU0.998
3Boise St0.965
4Ohio State0.912
5Wisconsin0.796
6Nevada0.785
7Stanford0.782
8Auburn0.78
9Alabama0.771
10Utah0.76
Quality Wins/Losses (QWL)
RankTeamPoints
1Auburn1
2Nebraska0.944
3Wisconsin0.777
4Texas0.573
5Iowa0.562
6South Carolina0.534
7LSU0.516
8Alabama0.491
9Oregon0.472
10Boise St0.444

ArizonaToledoIowaCaliforniaOregon St.Washington St.WashingtonUCLAStanford

Furthermore

Similar Posts

If you enjoyed this article, odds are you'll love the following as well.

Subscribe

Enter your e-mail address to receive new articles and/or comments directly to your inbox. Free!

  •  
  •  

This article is © 2007-2018 by De Veritate, LLC and was originally published at Clashmore Mike. This article may not be copied, distributed, or transmitted without attribution. Additionally, you may not use this article for commercial purposes or to generate derivative works without explicit written permission. Please contact us if you wish to license this content for your own use.